Admission to candidacy certifies that the student has demonstrated a depth of scholarship in the literature and the methods of the student's chosen area of research, and has demonstrated a facility with the scholarly skills of critical evaluation and verbal expression. The candidacy exam must be completed prior to the thesis proposal.
The student is examined by a committee consisting of the student's advisor and two other researchers who hold PhDs or equivalents. The advisor should solicit the prospective committee members, not the student. In cases where the student's research and departmental advisors are different, both must serve on the committee.
Scope and Structure
The committee, after consideration of the student's input, selects a syllabus of the 20-30 most significant documents that encompass the state of the art in the area. The student then studies this syllabus.
The oral exam begins with the student's 30 minute critical evaluation of the syllabus materials, and is followed by no more than 90 minutes of questioning by the committee on any subject matter related to their contents. The student is judged primarily on the oral evidence, but the content and style of the presentation can account for part of the decision.
The entire candidacy exam committee must be informed of the scheduling of the oral exam no later than two weeks (14 days) prior to the exam. The Doctoral Program Administrator must be informed of the scheduling of the oral exam no later than two weeks (14 days) prior to the exam. Emergency exceptions to either of these deadlines can be granted by the PhD Chair or the Department Chair on appeal by the advisor and agreement of the committee.
The student must pass the candidacy exam no later than the end of his/her sixth semester. It is not necessary to complete the breadth requirement before attempting the candidacy exam.
Passing or failing is determined by consensus of the committee, who then sign the candidacy exam form. Failure to pass the candidacy exam by the end of the sixth semester is deemed unsatisfactory progress: the student is normally placed on probation and can be immediately dismissed from the program. However, on appeal of the student's advisor, one semester's grace can be granted by the full faculty. The exam normally cannot be taken more than twice. However, on appeal of the student's advisor, an additional attempt can be permitted by the full faculty.
Last updated on September 16, 2015.