NOTE: only did ontology lookup for verbs

NOTE: structure shown by indentation, not by parentheses (I did not update them!) 


#Sentence TEXT 010 As CSA faces serious difficulties, the Czechs offer to buy back the French shares in their national airline

(0 / "*root*" :POS * :wordscore (*scores* )
   :* (1 / "text" :POS N )
   :main (11 / "offer" :POS V Concept: @::offer>give 1809085 
      :mod (5 / "face" :POS V Concept: @::face,present 840986 <NOT FOUND>
         :cc (3 / "as" :POS C )
         :subj (4 / "csa" :POS @SUBJ )
         :obj (7 / "difficulty" :POS N
            :mod (6 / "serious" :POS AJ ) )
         :mod (8 / "<comma>" :POS PX ) )
      :subj (10 / "czech" :POS N  AGENT-1809085
         :mod (9 / "the" :POS D ) )
      :obj (14 / "buy" :POS V  THEME-1809085 Concept: @::buy<get 1742847 <NOT FOUND>
         :subj (13 / "*trace*" :POS PRO )
         :mod (15 / "back" :POS AV )
         :obj (18 / "share" :POS N
            :mod (16 / "the" :POS D )
            :mod (17 / "french" :POS AJ )
            :mod (19 / "in" :POS P
               :obj (22 / "airline" :POS N
                  :mod (21 / "national" :POS AJ )
                  :mod (20 / "they" :POS PRO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

Comments:

- One mod attachment corrected, all else was correct
- could not find role info for 2 of 3 verbs -- was I doing sth wrong
- main verb (offer) worked fine
- what about "buy back"?



#Sentence The Czech Minister of Transportation, Jan Strasky, proposed on Saturday, January 8 that the State buy back the shares (just less than 20%) held by Air France and the Reserve Bank/deposit accounts in the national airline, CSA, so that they could be sold "to another partner, probably a bank."

<tree>

(0 / "*root*" :POS * :wordscore (*scores* )
   :subj (3 / "minister" :POS N AGENT-propose
      :mod (2 / "czech" :POS N )
      :mod (4 / "of" :POS P
         :obj (5 / "transportation" :POS N
      :mod (8 / "strasky" :POS N
         :mod (7 / "jan" :POS N
 :main (10 / "propose" :POS V Concept: @::project>offer     561550
   :mod (11 / "on" :POS P
      :obj (12 / "saturday" :POS N
         :mod (14 / "january" :POS N
            :mod (15 / "8" :POS NUM ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
   :obj (18 / "buy" :POS V THEME-propose Concept: @::buy<get 1742847 <NOT FOUND>
      :subj (17 / "state" :POS N   AGENT
      :mod (19 / "back" :POS AV )  
      :obj (21 / "share" :POS N   THEME
         :mod (22 / "(" :POS PX ) )
         :qua (24 / "less" :POS PRO
            :mod (25 / "than" :POS P
               :obj (26 / "20<percent>" :POS NUM
            :mod (23 / "just" :POS AV ) ) )
         :mod (28 / "hold" :POS V  Concept: @::hold<have   1812908 
            :subj (31 / "france" :POS N   AGENT
               :mod (30 / "air" :POS N ) ) ) )
               :cc (32 / "and" :POS C )
                  :mod (35 / "bank<forwardslash>deposit" :POS N
                     :mod (34 / "reserve" :POS N ) )
                     :main (37 / "account" :POS V
            :obj (36 / "*pro*-shares" :POS PRO ) )  THEME
         :mod (38 / "in" :POS P
            :obj (41 / "airline" :POS N
               :mod (40 / "national" :POS AJ )
               :mod (43 / "csa" :POS @APP
      :mod (48 / "sell" :POS V Concept: @::sell     1766863
         :cc (46 / "that" :POS C
            :mod (45 / "so" :POS AV ) )
         :obj (47 / "they" :POS PRO )   THEME-1766863
         :obj2 (52 / "partner" :POS N   BENEFICIARY-1766863
            :mod (51 / "another" :POS D ) ) ) )
            :mod (49 / "<quote>" :POS PX )
               :mod (54 / "probably" :POS AV )
            :mod (56 / "bank" :POS N
            :mod (58 / "<quote>" :POS PX ) )

Comments:

- Syntax pretty screwed up, but not that hard to correct
- Again, many verbs do not match to LCS
- For those that do, matching is easy
- Issue of to-PPs for transfer verbs -- should they be Obj2 or treated like free PPs -- need to make decision consistent in LCS and Syntax