Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell

From: Nicolas Krebs <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 23:34:03 +0200

>From: Nicolas Krebs <[email-masked]>
>To: [email-masked]
>Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)
>Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 23:55:47 +0200

>> - 'Atom Threading Extensions '
>>   <draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread-10.txt> as a Proposed Standard

>In section 3, this draft give an xml element corresponding to In-reply-to: 
>(rfc 2822 section 3.6.4). Therefore, the draft do not give an equivalent to 
>References: 822' header field (rfc 2822 section 3.6.4) (wich could be usefull 
>to build a mail --> atom gateway). 
>
>The section 7.2. do not mention rfc 2822. 

Sorry, my mistake. 

This draft give in section 3 an xml element corresponding to In-reply-to of 
rfc 2822 section 3.6.4. However the draft do not give an equivalent to the header field References of rfc 2822 section 3.6.4, which could be usefull 
to build mail --> atom gateway and usenet --> atom gateway,
and to find all previous message in a thread. 

The section 7.2. do not mention rfc 2822.