|
||||||||||
PREV CLASS NEXT CLASS | FRAMES NO FRAMES | |||||||||
SUMMARY: NESTED | FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD | DETAIL: FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD |
java.lang.Objectstory.dbcore.gui.DefaultTreeView
public class DefaultTreeView
A TreeView that just takes the ID of the node and does not use bins.
Constructor Summary | |
---|---|
DefaultTreeView()
|
Method Summary | |
---|---|
boolean |
hierarchicalTree(TreeType type)
Should the tree for a certain type organize its nodes hierarchically, putting SUBTYPEOF and INSTANCEOF nodes inside their respective parents, or list all nodes without hierarchy? |
java.lang.String[] |
nodeBin(TreeType type,
NodeAddress node)
How should nodes be sorted in the tree? |
java.lang.String |
nodeText(TreeType type,
NodeAddress node)
Given a node, what should the text of the node be in the Forest tree? |
boolean |
triggersReload(NodeType type,
AttributeID ID)
If the argued attribute is changed to a new value, should the Forest reload its tree models? |
boolean |
useBins(TreeType type)
Should nodeBin() be used or should all the nodes just be listed without bins? |
Methods inherited from class java.lang.Object |
---|
equals, getClass, hashCode, notify, notifyAll, toString, wait, wait, wait |
Constructor Detail |
---|
public DefaultTreeView()
Method Detail |
---|
public java.lang.String nodeText(TreeType type, NodeAddress node)
TreeView
nodeText
in interface TreeView
public java.lang.String[] nodeBin(TreeType type, NodeAddress node)
TreeView
nodeBin
in interface TreeView
public boolean useBins(TreeType type)
TreeView
useBins
in interface TreeView
public boolean triggersReload(NodeType type, AttributeID ID)
TreeView
triggersReload
in interface TreeView
public boolean hierarchicalTree(TreeType type)
TreeView
hierarchicalTree
in interface TreeView
|
||||||||||
PREV CLASS NEXT CLASS | FRAMES NO FRAMES | |||||||||
SUMMARY: NESTED | FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD | DETAIL: FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD |