TOC 
GeoprivH. Schulzrinne
Internet-DraftColumbia U.
Expires: November 22, 2006H. Tschofenig
 Siemens
 May 21, 2006

Location Types Registry

draft-ietf-geopriv-location-types-registry-06

Status of this Memo

By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”

The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

This Internet-Draft will expire on November 22, 2006.

Copyright Notice

Copyright © The Internet Society (2006).

Abstract

This document creates a registry for describing the types of places a human or end system might be found. The registry is then referenced by other protocols that need a common set of location terms as protocol constants. Examples of location terms defined in this document include aircraft, office and train station.



Table of Contents

1.  Introduction
2.  Terminology
3.  Location Types
4.  Schema
5.  IANA Considerations
    5.1  Registering Tokens
    5.2  URN Sub-Namespace Registration for 'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type'
    5.3  Schema Registration for Schema urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type
6.  Internationalization Considerations
7.  Security Considerations
8.  Acknowledgements
9.  References
    9.1  Normative References
    9.2  Informative References
§  Authors' Addresses
§  Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements




 TOC 

1. Introduction

This document creates a registry for location type tokens. We anticipate that the network, through configuration or management protocols, tells a mobile device what kind of location it finds itself in. The device and associated software can then tailor its behavior to the environment. For example, this document defines the terms "classroom", "place-of-worship" and "theater". A considerate owner of a cell phone might program the device to switch from ringer to vibrate mode in such environments. Just knowing the geographic location, be it as civic (street address) or geospatial coordinates would generally not allow the device to make a similar decision.

Naturally, the number of descriptive terms for physical environments is almost unbounded. This registry tries to identify common terms that are likely to be useful for communications devices and for controlling and guiding communication behavior. The terms roughly correspond to the level of details of location descriptions and icons found on geographic maps, for example, and are meant to be in common use across a variety of cultures and countries. The registration process described in the IANA Considerations section allows to extend this list as needed, while aiming to prevent an unnecessary explosion in the registry.

The use of tokens, i.e., protocol constants, makes it easier to build systems across multiple languages. A user interface can readily translate a finite set of tokens to user-appropriate textual or iconic representations. Protocols using this registry are encouraged to provide additional mechanisms to accommodate location types not currently registered via free-text fields with appropriate language and character set labeling.

The terms defined in this registry do not attempt to provide a hierarchy of location descriptions, except in certain special cases. For example, the term "restaurant" is defined to include the term "cafe" and the term "public" encompasses a range of descriptors, as noted below. The registry makes these more generic terms available as often the more detailed distinctions may not be available, or privacy concerns suggest the use of less precise terms that are still sufficient to guide communications behavior or evaluate the source of a phone call or message, say.

In many cases, a location might be described by multiple terms that apply at the same time. For example, the combination of "restaurant" and "airport" is immediately recognizable. This registry makes no attempt to limit the number of terms that can be used to describe a single place or to restrict what combinations are allowed, given that there are few combinations that are physically impossible. Common sense is probably a better guide here; the authors would not want to rule out creative business models such as combinations of "parking" and "restaurant" or "bar" and "hospital". The number of terms that can be used within the same protocol element is left to the protocol description.

This document does not describe how the values of the registry are to be used, as this description is provided by other documents. For example, [4] (Schulzrinne, H., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses Configuration Information,” January 2006.), describes a options for carrying civic address information, including the place-type attributes listed in this document, using the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6). A usage for RADIUS is described in [5] (Tschofenig, H., “Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS,” March 2006.), where this information is conveyed from the RADIUS client to the RADIUS server. Rich presence (RPID [6] (Schulzrinne, H., “RPID: Rich Presence Extensions to the Presence Information Data Format (PIDF),” December 2005.)) also utilizes the values of the location type registry.



 TOC 

2. Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [1] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).



 TOC 

3. Location Types

This section describes types of location where an entity is located. The entity is not further specified and can be a person or an object such as a network access point or end system.

aircraft:
A device that is used or intended to be used for flight in the air, such as an airplane, helicopter, gyroplane, glider or lighter-than-air devices like a balloon.
airport:
A place from which aircraft operate, such as an airport or heliport.
arena:
Enclosed area used for sports events.
automobile:
A usually four-wheeled automotive vehicle designed for passenger transportation, such as a car.
bank:
Business establishment in which money is kept for saving or commercial purposes or is invested, supplied for loans, or exchanged.
bar:
A bar or saloon.
bus:
A large motor vehicle designed to carry passengers.
bicycle:
A vehicle with two wheels tandem, a steering handle, a saddle seat, and pedals by which it is propelled.
bus-station:
Terminal that serves bus passengers, such as a bus depot or bus terminal.
cafe:
Usually small and informal establishment serving various refreshments (such as coffee); coffee shop.
classroom:
Academic classroom or lecture hall.
club:
Dance club, nightclub or discotheque.
construction:
Construction site.
convention-center:
Convention center or exhibition hall.
government:
Government building, such as those used by the legislative, executive, or judicial branches of governments, including court houses, police stations and military installations.
hospital:
Hospital, hospice, medical clinic, mental institution, or doctor's office.
hotel:
Hotel, motel, inn or other lodging establishment.
industrial:
Industrial setting, such as a manufacturing floor or power plant.
library:
Library or other public place in which literary and artistic materials, such as books, music, periodicals, newspapers, pamphlets, prints, records, and tapes, are kept for reading, reference, or lending.
motorcycle:
A two-wheeled automotive vehicle, including a scooter.
office:
Business setting, such as an office.
other:
A place without a registered place type representation.
outdoors:
Outside a building, in or into the open air, such as a park or city streets.
parking:
A parking lot or parking garage.
place-of-worship:
A religious site where congregations gather for religious observances, such as a church, chapel, meetinghouse, mosque, shrine, synagogue, or temple.
prison:
Correctional institution where persons are confined while on trial or for punishment, such as a prison, penitentiary, jail, brig.
public:
Public area such as a shopping mall, street, park, public building, train station, airport or in public conveyance such as a bus, train, plane or ship. This general description encompasses the more precise descriptors 'street', 'public-transport', 'aircraft', 'bus', 'bus-station', 'train', 'train-station', 'airport', 'shopping-area', 'outdoors', and 'watercraft'.
public-transport:
Any form of public transport, including aircraft, bus, train or ship.
residence:
A private or residential setting, not necessarily the personal residence of the entity, e.g., including a friend's home.
restaurant:
Restaurant, coffee shop or other public dining establishment.
school:
School or university property, but not necessarily a classroom or library.
shopping-area:
Shopping mall or shopping area. This area is a large, often enclosed shopping complex containing various stores, businesses, and restaurants usually accessible by common passageways.
stadium:
Large, usually open structure for sports events, including a racetrack.
store:
Place where merchandise is offered for sale, such as a shop.
street:
A public thoroughfare, such as a avenue, street, alley, lane, road, including any sidewalks.
theater:
Theater, lecture hall, auditorium, class room, movie theater or similar facility designed for presentations, talks, plays, music performances and other events involving an audience.
train:
Train, monorail, maglev, cable car or similar conveyance.
train-station:
Terminal where trains load or unload passengers or goods; railway station, railroad station, railroad terminal, train depot.
truck:
An automotive vehicle suitable for hauling, used primarily to carry goods rather than people.
underway:
In a land, water, or air craft which is underway (in motion).
unknown:
The type of place is unknown.
warehouse:
Place in which goods or merchandise are stored, such as a storehouse or self-storage facility.
water:
In, on or above bodies of water, such as an ocean, lake, river, canal or other waterway.
watercraft:
On a vessel for travel on water such as a boat or ship.



 TOC 

4. Schema

This registry can be used in two ways, first,as a list of tokens, to be referenced by appropriate protocols that accept textual tokens and secondly as a schema, with its own namespace, referenced by other schema, either explicity or via namespace="##other".


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type"
   xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type"
   xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
   elementFormDefault="qualified"
   attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

  <xs:complexType name="empty"/>

  <xs:element name="aircraft" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="airport" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="arena" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="automobile" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="bank" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="bar" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="bus" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="bicyle" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="bus-station" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="cafe" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="classroom" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="club" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="construction" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="convention-center" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="government" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="hospital" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="hotel" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="industrial" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="library" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="motorcyle" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="office" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="outdoors" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="parking" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="place-of-worship" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="prison" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="public" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="public-transport" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="residence" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="restaurant" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="school" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="shopping-area" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="stadium" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="store" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="street" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="theater" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="train" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="train-station" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="truck" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="underway" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="unknown" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="warehouse" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="water" type="empty" />
  <xs:element name="watercraft" type="empty" />
</xs:schema>





 TOC 

5. IANA Considerations

5.1 Registering Tokens

This document creates new IANA registries for location types as listed in Section 3 (Location Types) starting with 'aircraft' and finishing with 'watercraft'.

IANA will maintain this registry both in the form of an XML schema and a list of tokens, with the same content.

Following the policies outline in RFC 2434 [2] (Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, “Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs,” October 1998.), new tokens are assigned after Expert Review by the Expert Reviewer appointed by the IESG. The same procedure applies to updates of tokens within the registry and to deleting tokens from the registry.

The expert review should be guided by a few common-sense considerations. For example, tokens should not be specific to a country, region, organization or company, should be well-defined and should be widely recognized. The Expert's support of IANA will include providing IANA with the new token(s) when the update is provided only in the form of a schema, and providing IANA with the new schema element(s) when the update is provided only in the form of a token.

To ensure widespread usability across protocols, tokens MUST follow the character set restrictions for XML Names (Yergeau, F., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C., Bray, T., and E. Maler, “Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third Edition),” February 2004.)[3].

Each registration must include the name of the token and a brief description similar to the ones offered in for the initial registrations contained this document:

Token Identifier:
Identifier of the token.
Description:
Brief description indicating the meaning of the token, including one or more examples where the term encompasses several more precise terms.
XML namespace:
Tokens MAY be used as elements within other appropriate XML documents. Each token lists the namespace it is part of, typically urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type:ext, where 'ext' is the name of the extension.

Note that the usage of these tokens is not limited to XML and the 'Token Identifier' is the XML element content and not the XML element name.

5.2 URN Sub-Namespace Registration for 'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type'

URI:
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type
Description:
This is the XML namespace for XML elements defined by RFCXXXX [RFC editor: replace with RFC number] to describe location types within XML documents.
Registrant Contact:
IETF, GEOPRIV working group, geopriv@ietf.org, Henning Schulzrinne, hgs@cs.columbia.edu
XML:
 BEGIN
   <?xml version="1.0"?>
   <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.0//EN"
   "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic10.dtd">
   <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
   <head>
        <meta http-equiv="content-type"
        content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1"/>
        <title>Location Types Registry</title>
   </head>
   <body>
       <h1>Namespace for Location Types</h1>
       <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type</h2>
       <p>See <a href="URL of published RFC">RFC&rfc.number; [RFC
editor: replace with RFC number]</a>.</p>
    </body>
    </html>
   END

5.3 Schema Registration for Schema urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type

URI:
please assign
Registrant Contact:
IESG
XML:
See Section 4 (Schema)


 TOC 

6. Internationalization Considerations

The location-type values listed in this document MUST NOT be presented to the user. The values therefore have the characteristic of tokens or tags and no internationalization support is required.



 TOC 

7. Security Considerations

This document defines a registry for location types and as such does not raise security issues.



 TOC 

8. Acknowledgements

Vijay Gurbani, Paul Kyzivat and Jonathan Rosenberg contributed to RPID [6] (Schulzrinne, H., “RPID: Rich Presence Extensions to the Presence Information Data Format (PIDF),” December 2005.), which lead to the location types listed in this document. Many thanks to Harald Alvestrand, Frank Ellermann, Bill Fenner, Ted Hardie, David Kessens, Allison Mankin, Jon Peterson and Sam Hartman for their suggestions. Rick Jones pointed us to the Global Justice XML work (see http://it.ojp.gov/jxdm/) that helped us to add more values to the location registry.

Some of the definitions are derived from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary.



 TOC 

9. References



 TOC 

9.1 Normative References

[1] Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML).
[2] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, “Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs,” BCP 26, RFC 2434, October 1998 (TXT, HTML, XML).
[3] Yergeau, F., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C., Bray, T., and E. Maler, “Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third Edition),” W3C REC REC-xml-20040204, February 2004.


 TOC 

9.2 Informative References

[4] Schulzrinne, H., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses Configuration Information,” draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-civil-09 (work in progress), January 2006.
[5] Tschofenig, H., “Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS,” draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo-06 (work in progress), March 2006.
[6] Schulzrinne, H., “RPID: Rich Presence Extensions to the Presence Information Data Format (PIDF),” draft-ietf-simple-rpid-10 (work in progress), December 2005.


 TOC 

Authors' Addresses

  Henning Schulzrinne
  Columbia University
  Department of Computer Science
  450 Computer Science Building
  New York, NY 10027
  USA
Phone:  +1 212 939 7042
Email:  schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
URI:  http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs
  
  Hannes Tschofenig
  Siemens
  Otto-Hahn-Ring 6
  Munich, Bavaria 81739
  Germany
Email:  Hannes.Tschofenig@siemens.com
URI:  http://www.tschofenig.com


 TOC 

Intellectual Property Statement

Disclaimer of Validity

Copyright Statement

Acknowledgment